• A Vieillard-Baron, E Girou, E Valente, C Brun-Buisson, F Jardin, F Lemaire, and L Brochard.
• Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne, Créteil, France.
• Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000 May 1; 161 (5): 1597-601.

AbstractRight heart catheterization (RHC) has been suspected of increasing mortality. The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a frequent reason for RHC. We designed a retrospective cohort study of 119 consecutive ARDS patients admitted to two medical intensive care units of tertiary care hospitals in which two different approaches are used for hemodynamic monitoring: RHC on demand (Henri Mondor Hospital [HM]) and no use of RHC (Ambroise Paré Hospital [AP]). The study tried to identify risk factors for death, and to assess the influence of RHC, with adjustment for the intensity of hemodynamic support as a confounding factor, using 98 patients in whom the delay between onset of ARDS, use of vasopressors, and RHC did not exceed 48 h. Several variables, including septic shock, cause of ARDS, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, use of epinephrine/norepinephrine, and presence of RHC were entered into a logistic regression model to evaluate their independent prognostic roles. Mortality was different at HM and AP (36 of 55 patients [65.5%] versus 16 of 43 patients [37.2%], p < 0.005), and 29 of the 35 RHC-monitored patients died (82.8%), as compared with 23 of 63 patients (36.5%) treated without RHC (p < 0.0001). However, administration of epinephrine/norepinephrine and a nonpulmonary cause of ARDS were each independently associated with death. It is only when administration of vasopressors was omitted from the model that RHC, septic shock, and SAPS II became independent predictors of mortality. These results suggest that: (1) the use of vasopressors, but not of RHC, represents an important prognostic factor; and (2) not taking into account the use of these drugs may be misleading when assessing the influence of RHC on outcome.

22 keywords...

hide…