• Pediatr Med Chir · Sep 2002

    [Values of white blood cell count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis].

    • G Stefanutti, M Sabatti, D Gobbi, V Ghirardo, and P G Gamba.
    • Divisione di Chirurgia Pediatrica, Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani, 3, 35126 Padova, Italia.
    • Pediatr Med Chir. 2002 Sep 1; 24 (5): 368-73.

    BackgroundThe diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains a critical challenge for paediatric surgeons. White Blood Cell (WBC) count, once considered a basic exam, is still routinely performed in most institutions, despite its lack of accuracy. Aim of this study is to assess the additional value of WBC count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the charts of children who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis in the last two years at our institution. In the patients treated in 1999 (Group A), WBC count was assessed routinely after admission. The surgeons relied on leukocytosis as well as on clinical findings and on ultrasound abdominal scan for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In the patients treated in 2000 (Group B), blood cell count was not tested or deliberately ignored by the surgeons.ResultsThere were 65 children in Group A and 70 in Group B; the two groups of patients were similar in terms of gender (p = 0.989) and age (p = 0.758). Criteria for operation were similar in the two groups (p = 0.222). No differences were found in the number of perforated (p = 0.989) and normal (p = 0.217) appendixes in the two groups as well as in the duration of hospital stay after surgery (p = 0.849).ConclusionsWBC count at admission has no proven additional value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and can be omitted without modifying diagnostic pathway and without affecting diagnostic accuracy.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…