• Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Sep 2013

    Development of a self-report physical function instrument for disability assessment: item pool construction and factor analysis.

    • Christine M McDonough, Alan M Jette, Pengsheng Ni, Kara Bogusz, Elizabeth E Marfeo, Diane E Brandt, Leighton Chan, Mark Meterko, Stephen M Haley, and Elizabeth K Rasch.
    • Health and Disability Research Institute, Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University Medical Campus, Boston, MA, USA. cmm@bu.edu
    • Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep 1; 94 (9): 1653-60.

    ObjectivesTo build a comprehensive item pool representing work-relevant physical functioning and to test the factor structure of the item pool. These developmental steps represent initial outcomes of a broader project to develop instruments for the assessment of function within the context of Social Security Administration (SSA) disability programs.DesignComprehensive literature review; gap analysis; item generation with expert panel input; stakeholder interviews; cognitive interviews; cross-sectional survey administration; and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to assess item pool structure.SettingIn-person and semistructured interviews and Internet and telephone surveys.ParticipantsSample of SSA claimants (n=1017) and a normative sample of adults from the U.S. general population (n=999).InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasureModel fit statistics.ResultsThe final item pool consisted of 139 items. Within the claimant sample, 58.7% were white; 31.8% were black; 46.6% were women; and the mean age was 49.7 years. Initial factor analyses revealed a 4-factor solution, which included more items and allowed separate characterization of: (1) changing and maintaining body position, (2) whole body mobility, (3) upper body function, and (4) upper extremity fine motor. The final 4-factor model included 91 items. Confirmatory factor analyses for the 4-factor models for the claimant and the normative samples demonstrated very good fit. Fit statistics for claimant and normative samples, respectively, were: Comparative Fit Index=.93 and .98; Tucker-Lewis Index=.92 and .98; and root mean square error approximation=.05 and .04.ConclusionsThe factor structure of the physical function item pool closely resembled the hypothesized content model. The 4 scales relevant to work activities offer promise for providing reliable information about claimant physical functioning relevant to work disability.Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…