• Dis. Colon Rectum · Jun 2001

    Does stool collection method affect outcomes in immunochemical fecal occult blood testing?

    • H Nakama, B Zhang, A S Abdul Fattah, and N Kamijo.
    • Department of Public Health, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Aizawa Hospital, Asahi, Japan.
    • Dis. Colon Rectum. 2001 Jun 1; 44 (6): 871-5.

    PurposeThis paper compares the positive predictive value of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasms between the stool specimens obtained during the digital rectal examination and those obtained during the routine screening.MethodsIn a medical check-up, 1,688 subjects received both an immunochemical fecal occult blood test and a colonoscopy. Fecal occult blood was tested by two methods: digital rectal examination and routine screening. The positivity rate of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test and the positive predictive value for colorectal cancer and large adenomatous polyp were determined by these two methods.ResultsThe positivity rate and the positive predictive value were 5.4 percent and 19.8 percent (4.4 percent for cancer and 15.4 percent for adenomatous polyp) in the digital rectal examination method and 3.5 percent and 27.1 percent (6.8 percent for cancer and 20.3 percent for adenomatous polyp) in the routine screening method, respectively. These figures indicate a significant difference in the positivity rate (P < 0.01) and the positive predictive value (P < 0.05) between these two methods.ConclusionsThese findings indicate that the stool obtained by routine screening has a better positive predictive value than stool collected during the digital rectal examination.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…