• O Shimoda, Y Ikuta, M Nishi, and C Uneda.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Honjo, Japan. shimoda@kaiju.medic.kumamoto-u.ac.jp
• J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 1998 Jul 15; 71 (2-3): 183-9.

AbstractBecause nociceptive stimuli induce the skin vasomotor reflex (SVmR), the assessment of the SVmR would be a useful indicator to represent nociception. We examined 39 adult patients for the relationship between the magnitude of the SVmR and the intensity of nociceptive stimulus that induced the SVmR. Under oxygen-nitrous oxide (50%) and sevoflurane anesthesia, the SVmR was induced by an electrical impulse to the ulnar nerve and detected by a laser Doppler flowmeter. Study 1: under the end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane at 1.2% (n = 10), 1.7% (n = 9) or 2.2% (n = 10), the SVmR was tested by a 2-s, 50-Hz tetanic electrical impulse with a current intensity changing (40, 50 or 60 mA) in a randomized order. Study 2: under the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane at 1.7% (n = 10), the SVmR testing was performed with a 50-mA, 50-Hz tetanic electrical impulse with the current duration changing (2, 3 or 4 s) in a randomized order. The studies demonstrated significant correlations of (1) the current intensity which induces the skin vasomotor reflex (SVmR) vs. the magnitude of the SVmR under the three different anesthesia depths, (2) the anesthesia depth vs. the magnitude of the SVmR (inverse proportion) under the same current intensity and (3) the duration of electrostimulation vs. the magnitude of the SVmR. Thus, the SVmR could be helpful for the objective assessment of nociception and anti-nociceptive effects in individual cases.

22 keywords...

hide…