• J Med Liban · Oct 2014

    [Prospective study of microdiskectomy for lumbar disc herniation: evolution of pain, quality of life and satisfaction of Lebanese patients at short and long-term follow-up].

    • Amer Sebaaly, Jaafar Basma, Lara Raffoul, Nabil Okais, Toni Rizk, Elie Samaha, and Ronald Moussa.
    • J Med Liban. 2014 Oct 1; 62 (4): 187-90.

    Background And PurposeLumbar disc herniation frequently affects young patients and is responsible for high rate of worker's compensation claims. The aim of this study is to evaluate at short and long-term the results of microdiscectomy in terms of pain control, quality of life and patient's satisfaction.MethodsIn this prospective study, 28 patients were enrolled and operated on by microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Three questionnaires were administered preoperatively. They evaluated the pain, the quality of life and the expectation of the patients. Four questionnaires were administered at six months and two years postoperatively evaluating pain, quality of life, results and satisfactions.ResultsA 62.3% and 53.2% improvement of low back pain at 6 months and 2 years respectively, and a 91.7% and 88.4% improvement of radicular pain were reported. A 73.2% and 79.8% improvement in quality of life was recorded respectively. Patient's expectation was evaluated at 3.85 and results estimated 3.24. Patient's satisfaction was 93.3% and 88.3% respectively. It was positively correlated to radicular pain, and inversely correlated to patient's expectations.ConclusionMicrodiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation offers a marked improvement in back and radicular pain. Quality of life is much improved. Although satisfaction is high, it is somewhat decreased for patients with high expectations.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…