-
J Pain Symptom Manage · May 2015
Review Meta Analysis Comparative StudyMeasuring Experience With End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Literature Review.
- Jessica Penn Lendon, Sangeeta C Ahluwalia, Anne M Walling, Karl A Lorenz, Oluwatobi A Oluwatola, Rebecca Anhang Price, Denise Quigley, and Joan M Teno.
- VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address: jessicapenn@gmail.com.
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 May 1; 49 (5): 904-15.e1-3.
ContextIncreasing interest in end-of-life care has resulted in many tools to measure the quality of care. An important outcome measure of end-of-life care is the family members' or caregivers' experiences of care.ObjectivesTo evaluate the instruments currently in use to inform next steps for research and policy in this area.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of PubMed, PsycINFO, and PsycTESTS(®) for all English-language articles published after 1990 using instruments to measure adult patient, family, or informal caregiver experiences with end-of-life care. Survey items were abstracted and categorized into content areas identified through an iterative method using three independent reviewers. We also abstracted information from the most frequently used surveys about the identification of proxy respondents for after-death surveys, the timing and method of survey administration, and the health care setting being assessed.ResultsWe identified 88 articles containing 51 unique surveys with available content. We characterized 14 content areas variably present across the 51 surveys. Information and care planning, provider care, symptom management, and overall experience were the most frequent areas addressed. There was also considerable variation across the surveys in the identification of proxy respondents, the timing of survey administration, and in the health care settings and services being evaluated.ConclusionThis review identified several comprehensive surveys aimed at measuring the experiences of end-of-life care, covering a variety of content areas and practical issues for survey administration. Future work should focus on standardizing surveys and administration methods so that experiences of care can be reliably measured and compared across care settings.Published by Elsevier Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.