• J Pain Symptom Manage · Mar 2015

    Review

    Which treatment is better? Ascertaining patient preferences with crossover randomized controlled trials.

    • David Hui, Donna S Zhukovsky, and Eduardo Bruera.
    • Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. Electronic address: dhui@mdanderson.org.
    • J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Mar 1; 49 (3): 625631625-31.

    ContextThe difference in patient-reported outcomes between study arms can often be difficult to ascertain in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using a parallel design because of wide interindividual variations in baseline characteristics and how patients interpret the outcome measures. Furthermore, the minimal clinically significant difference is often not available for many outcomes, and even when available, not individualized for each patient. Crossover RCTs are designed for intraindividual comparisons, which can address these issues by asking patients to directly compare the interventions with regard to effectiveness, adverse effects, and ease of use and to provide an overall choice.ObjectivesWe discuss the key design elements for crossover trials, their advantages and disadvantages relative to parallel designs, and their utility in palliative care research using a number of case examples.MethodsThis is a narrative review.ResultsCrossover studies randomize patients to a sequence of treatments. In addition to facilitating intraindividual comparisons, they often require a smaller sample size for the same statistical power compared with parallel designs and are thus less costly. However, crossover studies are only feasible when the condition being studied is relatively stable and the intervention has a short-term effect. Crossover studies with inadequate washout periods may be difficult to interpret. The risk of attrition also may increase because of prolonged study duration.ConclusionBy facilitating intraindividual comparisons and eliciting patient preferences, crossover studies can provide unique information on the superior intervention. Crossover designs should be considered for selected palliative care studies.Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.