• Hitoshi Yamamura, Takasei Morioka, Tomonori Yamamoto, and Yasumitsu Mizobata.
• Department of Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, 5 Zaifuchou, Hirosaki city, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan. yamamura@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.
• Scand J Trauma Resus. 2016 Jun 7; 24: 83.

BackgroundThe ability to predict outcome in patients with cerebral edema is important because it can influence treatment strategy. We evaluated whether differences in head computed tomographic (CT) measurements in Hounsfield units (HU) of white matter and gray matter can be used as a predictor of outcome in patients with subdural hematoma with cerebral edema.MethodsWe evaluated 34 patients who had subdural hematoma with cerebral edema following acute closed head trauma and had undergone head CT within a few hours of admission. We divided them into the survival (n = 24) group and death (n = 10) group, and measured the HU of white matter and gray matter at injury and non-injury sites.ResultsThere were no significant differences in operation time or blood loss during surgery between the two groups. Only the HU of white matter in the injury site of patients in the death group were decreased significantly. A cut-off value of 31.5 for HU of white matter showed 80.0 % sensitivity and 99.9 % specificity for death; the area under the curve was 0.91.DiscussionOur results are more evidence of the support of neurogenic edema in trauma rather than an important clinical tool at this stage. However, HU values in WM may be one factor in the decision-making process that affects patient outcome. Changing the treatment strategy in patients with a low HU value in the WM at the injury site may bring about an improvement in patient outcome.ConclusionMeasurement in HU of white matter at the injury site might be useful as a predictor of outcome in patients with subdural hematoma with cerebral edema.

32 keywords...

hide…