-
- Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim, Tae-Ahn Jahng, and Hyun-Jib Kim.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea.
- Spine. 2016 Jul 7.
Study DesignA prospective randomized clinical trial.ObjectiveCompare the impact of robotic guidance in a minimally-invasive spine surgery (MIS) to a fluoroscopy-guided, open approach, in lumbar fusions.Summary Of Background DataMIS requires a protracted learning curve and excessively exposes the patient and surgical team to harmful radiation. Robotic-guidance has been shown to improve accuracy and radiation in most studies, but there is conflicting prospective data.MethodsPatients indicated to undergo a 1 or 2 level spinal fusion were randomized between robotic-guided MIS (RO) and fluoroscopic-guided open surgery (FA). Patient demographics and outcomes were recorded.ResultsThirty patients were recruited to each arm. Average age was 66.7, 71.5% were females, average BMI was 25.2. Thirty-five levels were instrumented with 130 pedicle screws in RO vs. 40 levels with 140 screws in FA, or 4.3 and 4.7 screws per surgery, respectively. Use of fluoroscopy was 3.5 vs. 13.3 seconds in the RO and FA respectively (p < 0.001). C-arm output in mSv was 0.13 vs. 0.27 in the RO and FA respectively (p = 0.015). By thermo-luminescent dosimeters, the average per-screw radiation in the RO arm was 37.5% of that in the FA arm, demonstrating a mean reduction of 62.5% in use of radiation. There was no difference in the improvement in VAS scores for back and leg or the ODI. All screws were accurate in RO while 2 breached (>2 mm and >4 mm) in FA (p = 0.500). One proximal facet violation occurred in the study, it was in FA (p = 1.000). The average distance from the proximal facets was 5.8 vs. 4.6 mm in the RO and FA respectively (p < 0.001). The average length of stay was 6.8 vs. 9.4 days in RO compared with FA (p = 0.020).ConclusionMIS using Robotic-guidance significantly reduced radiation exposure and length of stay. Patient outcomes were not affected by the surgical technique.Level Of Evidence1.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.