• Der Unfallchirurg · Feb 1999

    Comparative Study

    [Replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament. Biomechanical studies for patellar and semitendinosus tendon fixation with a poly(D,L-lactide) interference screw].

    • A Weiler, R F Hoffmann, N P Südkamp, C J Siepe, and N P Haas.
    • Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
    • Unfallchirurg. 1999 Feb 1; 102 (2): 115-23.

    AbstractAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons are being performed more frequently and satisfactory results have been reported. Advantages such as low donor site morbidity and ease of harvest as well as disadvantages like low initial construct stiffness have been described. Recently, it has been demonstrated that graft fixation close to the original ACL insertion sites increases anterior knee stability and graft isometry. Hamstring tendon fixation techniques using interference screws offer this possibility. To reduce the risk of graft laceration, a round threaded titanium interference screw (RCI) was developed. To improve initial fixation strength, fixation techniques for hamstring tendons with separate or attached tibial bone plugs were introduced. However, data on fixation strength do not yet exist. With respect to the proposed advantages of biodegradable implants, like undistorted magnetic resonance imaging, uncompromised revision surgery and a decreased potential of graft laceration during screw insertion, we performed pullout tests of round threaded biodegradable and round threaded titanium interference screw fixation of semitendinosus (ST) grafts with and without distally attached tibial bone plugs. Data were compared with bone-tendon-bone (BTB) graft fixation using biodegradable and conventional titanium interference screws. We used 56 proximal calf tibiae to compare maximum pullout force, screw insertion torque, and stiffness of fixation for biodegradable direct ST tendon and bone plug fixation (group I: without bone plug, group II: with bone plug) versus titanium interference screw fixation (group III: without bone plug, group IV: with bone plug). A round threaded biodegradable poly-(D, L-lactide) (Sysorb) and a round threaded titanium interference screw (RCI) were used. As a control calf bone-tendon-bone (BTB) grafts fixed with either poly-(D, L-lactide) (group V) or conventional titanium (group VI) interference screws were used. ST tendons were harvested either with or without their distally attached tibial bone plugs from human cadavers and were folded to a three-stranded graft. Specimen were loaded in a material testing machine with the applied load parallel to the long axis of the bone tunnel. Maximum pullout force of ST bone plug (group III: 717 N +/- 90, group IV: 602 N +/- 117) fixation was significantly higher than that of direct tendon (group I: 507 N +/- 93, group III: 419 N +/- 77) fixation. Maximum pullout force of biodegradable screw ST fixation was higher than that of titanium screw fixation in both settings. There was no significant difference in pullout force between biodegradable (713 N +/- 210) and titanium (822 N +/- 130) BTB graft fixation or between ST fixation with bone plug and biodegradable screw with BTB fixation. Pullout force of hamstring tendon interference screw fixation can be improved by using a biodegradable implant. In addition, initial pullout force can be greatly improved by harvesting the hamstring tendon graft with its distally attached tibial bone plug. This may be important, especially in improving tibial graft fixation. This study encourages further research in tendon-bone healing with direct interference screw fixation to confirm the potential of this advanced method.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.