• A Gries, M Helm, and E Martin.
• Klinik für Anaesthesiologie-Bereich Notfallmedizin, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg. andre_gries@med.uni-heidelberg.de
• Anaesthesist. 2003 Aug 1; 52 (8): 718-24.

AbstractAgainst the background of an ever-increasing shortage of financial support, closure of smaller hospitals and shortage of personnel in the medical branch, the necessity of the Federal emergency system is being increasingly called into question. In reality the number of missions which are relatively indicated are clearly increasing nationwide: an emergency doctor is not absolutely necessary in many situations. However, for complex emergency situations in Germany, an emergency medical system must remain an integral component of the preclinical care system in addition to the well-trained rescue service personnel. Hereby it is less important to have more emergency medical doctors, but more important to have a higher emergency medical qualification, possibly by a reduction in the density of emergency service stations. By the introduction of a ranked assistance system and the inclusion of "first responders", the time period before the arrival of the highly qualified emergency medical doctor can be bridged by qualified paramedics and general practitioners. The impulse of the legislators, assimilation of the rescue service acts, restructuring of rescue service catchment areas and the introduction of integrated demand-oriented control stations with a consequent quality management system as well as the implementation of a medical leader rescue system can reduce costs and further improve the quality of the emergency medical rescue system.

11 keywords...

hide…