• Spine J · Mar 2010

    Comprehensive computed tomography assessment of the upper cervical anatomy: what is normal?

    • Kristen E Radcliff, Peleg Ben-Galim, Niv Dreiangel, Shannon B Martin, Charles A Reitman, James N Lin, and John A Hipp.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 6620 Main St., 11th Floor, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
    • Spine J. 2010 Mar 1; 10 (3): 219-29.

    Background ContextHigh-speed computed tomography (CT) exams have replaced traditional radiographs for assessment of cervical spine injuries in many emergency departments. Recent evidence demonstrates that even subtle displacements can indicate significant upper cervical spine injuries. Many different anatomical measurements have been described in the upper cervical spine to date, most of them based on X-ray. The range of anatomical relationships that exist in an uninjured population must be known to reliably detect abnormal relations. The measurements with the lowest normal variation are likely to be most useful in detecting injuries.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to describe the normal quantitative anatomical relationships as well as the threshold measurements most likely to detect injury in the upper cervical spine.Study Design/SettingRetrospective anatomical case review.Patient SampleSeventy-six thin-sliced cervical CT scans randomly selected from a trauma population, all negative for injury in the cervical spine.MethodsForty-two different anatomical measurements were made of the upper cervical spine. These included traditional historical measurements and other detailed dimensions to characterize occipitocervical (OC) and atlantoaxial (AA) joint relationships.ResultsAfter review of all the anatomical measurements performed in the upper cervical spine, direct measurements of the joint space had the least variation. The mean OC joint space was 0.6mm, with an upper 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1mm at the most anterior or posterior aspects of the joints. This was true for both sagittal and coronal measurements. The mean AA joint space was 0.6mm, with an upper 95% CI of 1.2mm at the lateral aspect of the joint on the coronal image only. The midsagittal structures demonstrated significantly higher standard deviation and variability.ConclusionsThese results revealed consistently narrow joint spaces and left-right symmetry in the upper cervical spine joints that do not vary according to demographics. There was distinctly greater consistency in the coronal plane, which enabled more precise diagnostic measurement and side-to-side comparison of measurements. This precision will enable more accurate identification of abnormal scans, which should prompt consideration for additional workup. Thus, better understanding of these relationships may enable earlier detection of subtle craniocervical dissociative injuries based on CT scan data. This is important, because the only evidence of a severe injury on CT can be subtle misalignment.Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.