-
- Linda W Ma, Ismael Dominguez-Rosado, Renee L Gennarelli, Peter B Bach, Mithat Gonen, Michael I D'Angelica, Ronald P DeMatteo, T Peter Kingham, Murray F Brennan, William R Jarnagin, and Peter J Allen.
- *Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY †Center of Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ‡Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
- Ann. Surg. 2016 Jul 15.
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the costs of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine pasireotide use.Summary Of Background DataWe recently completed a prospective randomized trial that demonstrated an 11.7% absolute risk reduction of clinically significant POPF with use of perioperative pasireotide in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy [POPF: pasireotide (n = 152), 9% vs placebo (n = 148), 21%; P = 0.006].MethodsAn institutional modeling system was utilized to obtain total direct cost estimates from the 300 patients included in the trial. This system identified direct costs of hospitalization, physician fees, laboratory tests, invasive procedures, outpatient encounters, and readmissions. Total direct costs were calculated from the index admission to 90 days after resection. Costs were converted to Medicare proportional dollars (MP$).ResultsClinically significant POPF occurred in 45 of the 300 randomized patients (15%). The mean total cost for all patients was MP$23,400 (MP$8,000 - MP$202,500). The mean cost for those who developed clinically significant POPF was MP$39,700 (MP$13,800 - MP$202,500) versus MP$20,500 (MP$8,000 - MP$62,900) for those who did not (P = 0.001). The mean cost of pasireotide within the treatment group (n = 152) was MP$3,300 (MP$300 - MP$3,800). The mean cost was lower in the pasireotide (n = 152) group than the placebo (n = 148) group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (pasireotide, MP$22,800 vs placebo, MP$23,900: P = 0.571).ConclusionsThe development of POPF nearly doubled the total cost of pancreatic resection. In this randomized trial, the routine use of pasireotide significantly reduced the occurrence of POPF without increasing the overall cost of care.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.