• Annals of surgery · Nov 2016

    Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Impact of a Large Hiatal Hernia on Outcomes After Surgery.

    • Anne Gandon, Caroline Gronnier, Florence Renaud, Paul Borde, Marguerite Vanderbeken, Flora Hec, Guillaume Piessen, Antoine Adenis, Xavier Mirabel, and Christophe Mariette.
    • *Univ.Lille, Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France†Univ.Lille, URM-S 1172 - JPArc - Centre de Recherche, Jean-Pierre AUBERT Neurosciences et Cancer, Lille, France‡Inserm, UMR-S 1172, Lille, France§Univ.Lille, Department of Pathology, Centre de Biologie et Pathologie, University Hospital, Lille, France¶SIRIC ONCOLille, Lille, France||Univ.Lille, Department of Radiology, Claude Huriez University Hospital, University Hospital, Lille, France**Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France††Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France.
    • Ann. Surg. 2016 Nov 1; 264 (5): 862-870.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate complete tumor resection rate (primary objective), 30-day postoperative outcomes, and survival (secondary objectives) in patients with a hiatal hernia (HH) ≥5 cm (HH group) compared with those who did not have a HH or presented with a HH <5 cm (control group).BackgroundHH is a risk factor for esophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma (EGJA). Its impact on the outcomes after EGJA surgery is unknown.MethodsAmong 367 patients who underwent surgery for EGJA, a HH was searched for on computerized tomography scan and barium swallow, with comparison between the HH (n = 42) and control (n = 325) groups.ResultsIn the HH group, EGJAs exhibited higher rates of incomplete resection (50.0% vs 4.0%; P < 0.001), of pN3 stages (28.5% vs 10.1%; P = 0.002), and lower median survival (20.9 vs 41.0 mos; P = 0.001). After adjustment, a HH ≥5 cm was a predictor of incomplete resection (odds ratio 21.0, 95% confidence interval 9.4-46.8, P < 0.001) and a poor prognostic factor (hazard ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.5, P = 0.025). In the HH group, 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy (20.0% vs 0%; P = 0.040), which was related to greater cardiac and pulmonary toxicity.ConclusionsFor the first time, we showed that a HH ≥5 cm is associated with a poor prognosis in patients who had surgery for EGJA, linked to greater incomplete resection and lymph node involvement. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was associated with a significant toxicity in patients with a HH ≥5 cm.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.