• JAMA psychiatry · Sep 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Gamma ventral capsulotomy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized clinical trial.

    • Antonio C Lopes, Benjamin D Greenberg, Miguel M Canteras, Marcelo C Batistuzzo, Marcelo Q Hoexter, André F Gentil, Carlos A B Pereira, Marinês A Joaquim, Maria E de Mathis, Carina C D'Alcante, Anita Taub, Douglas G de Castro, Lucas Tokeshi, Leonardo A N P C Sampaio, Cláudia C Leite, Roseli G Shavitt, Juliana B Diniz, Geraldo Busatto, Georg Norén, Steven A Rasmussen, and Eurípedes C Miguel.
    • Department and Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
    • JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Sep 1; 71 (9): 1066-76.

    ImportanceSelect cases of intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have undergone neurosurgical ablation for more than half a century. However, to our knowledge, there have been no randomized clinical trials of such procedures for the treatment of any psychiatric disorder.ObjectiveTo determine the efficacy and safety of a radiosurgery (gamma ventral capsulotomy [GVC]) for intractable OCD.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsIn a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, 16 patients with intractable OCD were randomized to active (n = 8) or sham (n = 8) GVC. Blinding was maintained for 12 months. After unblinding, sham-group patients were offered active GVC.InterventionsPatients randomized to active GVC had 2 distinct isocenters on each side irradiated at the ventral border of the anterior limb of the internal capsule. The patients randomized to sham GVC received simulated radiosurgery using the same equipment.Main Outcomes And MeasuresScores on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale. Response was defined as a 35% or greater reduction in Y-BOCS severity and "improved" or "much improved" CGI-I ratings.ResultsThree of 8 patients randomized to active treatment responded at 12 months, while none of the 8 sham-GVC patients responded (absolute risk reduction, 0.375; 95% CI, 0.04-0.71). At 12 months, OCD symptom improvement was significantly higher in the active-GVC group than in the sham group (Y-BOCS, P = .046; Dimensional Y-BOCS, P = .01). At 54 months, 2 additional patients in the active group had become responders. Of the 4 sham-GVC patients who later received active GVC, 2 responded by post-GVC month 12. The most serious adverse event was an asymptomatic radiation-induced cyst in 1 patient.Conclusions And RelevanceGamma ventral capsulotomy benefitted patients with otherwise intractable OCD and thus appears to be an alternative to deep-brain stimulation in selected cases. Given the risks inherent in any psychiatric neurosurgery, such procedures should be conducted at specialized centers.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01004302.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.