• Lisa M Einhorn and Ashraf S Habib.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road #5672 HAFS, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. lisa.einhorn@dm.duke.edu.
• Can J Anaesth. 2016 Oct 1; 63 (10): 1170-1178.

PurposeThe purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate factors associated with failed and high spinal blocks in patients who received spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery following a labour epidural that was inadequate for surgical anesthesia.MethodsWe searched our perioperative database for women with a labour epidural who received spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for Cesarean delivery due to the inadequacy of the existing epidural. The primary outcome was the occurrence of failed spinal blocks, and the secondary outcome was the occurrence of high blocks following spinal administration.ResultsOf the 263 patients in the analysis, there were 29 (11%) failed spinals and nine (3%) high spinals. There was a significant difference between patients with failed spinals and those with successful spinals with regards to receipt of an epidural top-up dose for Cesarean delivery within 30 min of the spinal, type of neuraxial block, body mass index, age, and dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine. In a multivariable analysis, only receipt of an epidural top-up dose was associated with failure (OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 2.1 to 17.0; P < 0.001). As for the risk of a high spinal, patient characteristics and block details were not different amongst patients, except for a younger age in those with a high block.ConclusionsAdministration of spinal anesthesia within 30 min of an epidural top-up dose is associated with increased risk of failure. We speculate that this may be due in part to the presence of a large volume of local anesthetic in the epidural space, which may be mistaken for cerebrospinal fluid during spinal placement.

35 keywords...

hide…