• Colin Pritchard, Lorraine Clapham, Lesley Foulkes, Dorothy A Lang, and Glenn Neil-Dwyer.
• Bournemouth University, Institute of Health and Community Studies, Bournemouth, UK.
• Surg Neurol. 2004 Jul 1; 62 (1): 7-16.

ObjectivesTo compare the psychosocial outcomes of cohorts of elective [Acoustic Neuroma (AN)] and emergency [Aneu-rysmal Sub Arachnoid Hemorrhage (ASAH)] Neurosurgical patients and carers.MethodsThe standardized Wessex Patient Carer Questionnaire was designed with patients and carers and provided psychosocial and economic outcome data following elective or emergency surgery. Clinical data on size of tumor and size of bleed, respectively, were extracted from Consultant notes.ResultsBoth cohorts were generally satisfied with neurosurgical in-patient care but both suffered high-economic costs and were predominately very dissatisfied with community care. There were significant psychosocial differences between elective and emergency patients, and despite greater relative physical disability among elective patients, it was the emergency cohort who had worse psychosocial outcomes.ConclusionsDespite many common psychosocial features, the differences between the cohorts were mainly psychological rather than physiological, because of greater 'post-traumatic-stress-reaction' in the emergency cohort, indicating the need for appropriate psychosocial care immediately after neurosurgery to reduce unnecessary distress and costs to patients, carers, and community.

25 keywords...

hide…