-
American heart journal · May 2013
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter StudyContrast-induced acute kidney injury and clinical outcomes after intra-arterial and intravenous contrast administration: risk comparison adjusted for patient characteristics by design.
- Judith Kooiman, Pum A Le Haen, Gülçin Gezgin, Jean-Paul P de Vries, Doeke Boersma, Harald F Brulez, Yvo W Sijpkens, Aart J van der Molen, Suzanne C Cannegieter, Jaap F Hamming, and Menno V Huisman.
- Department of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Nephrology, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands. j.kooiman@lumc.nl
- Am. Heart J. 2013 May 1; 165 (5): 793-99, 799.e1.
BackgroundDirect comparisons between risk of contrast induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after intra-arterial versus intravenous contrast administration are scarce. We estimated and compared the risk of CI-AKI and its clinical course after both modes of contrast administration in patients who underwent both.MethodsOne hundred seventy patients who received both intra-arterial and intravenous contrast injections within one year between 2001 and 2010 were included. Primary outcome was occurrence of CI-AKI. Secondary outcomes were duration of hospital stay, the need for dialysis, recovery of renal function, and mortality.ResultsThe risk of CI-AKI was 24/170 (14.0%, 95% CI 9.6-20.2) after intra-arterial contrast injection versus 20/170 (11.7%, 95% CI 7.7-17.5) after intravenous contrast administration, which led to a relative risk of 1.2 (95% CI 0.7-2.1). None of the patients had a need for dialysis. Median duration of hospital stay in CI-AKI patients was 15.0 days (2.5-97.5, percentile 1-92) after intra-arterial and 15.5 days (2.5-97.5, percentile 0-38) after intravenous contrast procedures. Renal function recovered after CI-AKI in 13/24 after intra-arterial and in 10/20 patients after intravenous contrast administration. Mortality risks in CI-AKI patients were slightly higher than in non-CI-AKI patients, hazard ratios 1.6 (95% CI 0.7-3.7) for intra-arterial and 1.7 (95% CI 0.7-4.4) for intravenous contrast administration, adjusted for confounders.ConclusionThe risk of CI-AKI, and its clinical course was similar after intra-arterial and intravenous contrast media administration, after adjustment by design for patient-related risk factors.Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.