• F Suzuki, M Nakajima, M Matsuda, T Tanaka, K Matsumura, and T Koyama.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Ohtsu, Japan.
• No Shinkei Geka. 1999 Jan 1; 27 (1): 95-100.

AbstractTwo cases of axis fracture are reported. Traffic accidents were the cause of injury in both cases. The odontoid process was dislocated anterolaterally with fracture of the lateral mass of the axis in both cases. In Case 1 good alignment of the atlas and axis could not be maintained even with a Halo-vest. The case 2 patient with spinal cord compression caused by dislocation of the axis was referred to our hospital 8 weeks after the accident. Both cases were surgically treated in a similar fashion. Because of the lateral mass fracture and lateral displacement of the atlas relative to the axis, posterior screw fixation with interlaminar fixation (Magerl) was thought to carry a risk of causing damage to the vertebral artery. Because of this, anterior screw fixation combined with posterior wiring was conducted. First, the odontoid process was fixed anteriorly by a screw because it was able to be placed back in good alignment while the patient was in the supine position. Then, the posterior C1-2 interlaminar wiring with iliac bone graft was added. Rigid fixation was obtained without any complication. Various kinds of fixation, such as posterior interlaminar wiring, odontoid screw fixation and Magerl's fixation, have been reported for the treatment of unstable axis fracture. Among them Magerl's method has been regarded as the most stable. When it is not applicable, combination of the first two methods can be an alternative way of treatment for this odontoid process fracture.

22 keywords...

hide…