• Victor Y Kong, George V Oosthuizen, Benn Sartorius, Claire M Keene, and Damian L Clarke.
• Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, Department of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. Electronic address: victorywkong@yahoo.com.
• J Surg Educ. 2015 Jul 1; 72 (4): 600-5.

ObjectiveTo review the ability of junior doctors (JDs) in identifying the correct anatomical site for intercostal chest drain insertion and whether prior Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) training influences this.DesignWe performed a prospective, observational study using a structured survey and asked a group of JDs (postgraduate year 1 [PGY1] or year 2 [PGY2]) to indicate on a photograph the exact preferred site for intercostal chest drain insertion.SettingThis study was conducted in a large metropolitan university hospital in South Africa.ResultsA total of 152 JDs participated in the study. Among them, 63 (41%) were men, and the mean age was 24 years. There were 90 (59%) PGY1 doctors and 62 (41%) PGY2 doctors. Overall, 28% (42/152) of all JDs correctly identified the site that was located within the accepted safe triangle. A significantly higher proportion of PGY2 doctors selected the correct site when compared with PGY1 doctors (39% vs 20%, p = 0.026). Those who had prior ATLS provider training were 6.8 times more likely to be able to identify the correct site (RR = 6.8, 95% CI: 3.7-12.5).ConclusionsMost of the JDs do not have sufficient anatomical knowledge to identify the safe insertion site for intercostal chest drain. Those who had undergone ATLS training were more likely to be able to identify the safe insertion site.Copyright © 2015 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

24 keywords...

hide…