• J Rheumatol · Dec 2015

    Review Multicenter Study

    Development of a Draft Core Set of Domains for Measuring Shared Decision Making in Osteoarthritis: An OMERACT Working Group on Shared Decision Making.

    • Karine Toupin-April, Jennifer Barton, Liana Fraenkel, Linda Li, Viviane Grandpierre, Francis Guillemin, Tamara Rader, Dawn Stacey, France Légaré, Janet Jull, Jennifer Petkovic, Marieke Scholte-Voshaar, Vivian Welch, Anne Lyddiatt, Cathie Hofstetter, Maarten De Wit, Lyn March, Tanya Meade, Robin Christensen, Cécile Gaujoux-Viala, Maria E Suarez-Almazor, Annelies Boonen, Christoph Pohl, Richard Martin, and Peter S Tugwell.
    • From the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; VA Portland Health Care System, and Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Rheumatic Diseases, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France; Institute of Population Health, Centre for Global Health, and School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Bruyere Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; University of Twente, Enschede; VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Institute of Bone and Joint Research; University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Department of Rheumatology, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Rheumatology, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier I University, Nîmes, France; Department of General Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine II Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology, Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine, Schlosspark-Klinik, Teaching Hospital of the Charité, University Medicine, Berlin, Germany; Rheumatology, Michigan State University College of Human Medic
    • J Rheumatol. 2015 Dec 1; 42 (12): 2442-7.

    ObjectiveDespite the importance of shared decision making for delivering patient-centered care in rheumatology, there is no consensus on how to measure its process and outcomes. The aim of this Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) working group is to determine the core set of domains for measuring shared decision making in intervention studies in adults with osteoarthritis (OA), from the perspectives of patients, health professionals, and researchers.MethodsWe followed the OMERACT Filter 2.0 method to develop a draft core domain set by (1) forming an OMERACT working group; (2) conducting a review of domains of shared decision making; and (3) obtaining opinions of all those involved using a modified nominal group process held at a session activity at the OMERACT 12 meeting.ResultsIn all, 26 people from Europe, North America, and Australia, including 5 patient research partners, participated in the session activity. Participants identified the following domains for measuring shared decision making to be included as part of the draft core set: (1) identifying the decision, (2) exchanging information, (3) clarifying views, (4) deliberating, (5) making the decision, (6) putting the decision into practice, and (7) assessing the effect of the decision. Contextual factors were also suggested.ConclusionWe proposed a draft core set of shared decision-making domains for OA intervention research studies. Next steps include a workshop at OMERACT 13 to reach consensus on these proposed domains in the wider OMERACT group, as well as to detail subdomains and assess instruments to develop a core outcome measurement set.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.