• Eur J Anaesthesiol · May 2012

    A prospective observational evaluation of an anatomically guided, logically formulated airway measure to predict difficult laryngoscopy.

    • Frances Chung, Joshua C Rucker, David Cole, Laarni R Guerina, and Nitai Zoran.
    • Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. josh.rucker@utoronto.ca
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 May 1;29(5):213-7.

    ContextDifficulty during tracheal intubation is the most common cause of serious adverse respiratory events for patients undergoing anaesthesia. Current traditional bedside predictors of difficult laryngoscopy have poor sensitivity. A simple method to accurately predict difficult laryngoscopy could greatly improve patient safety.ObjectivesThis study examined a novel bedside predictor of difficult laryngoscopy that calculates a ratio of measurements directly affecting the ability to achieve the necessary line of vision (NLV) from the larynx to the operator (NLV ratio).DesignThis was a prospective observational study.SettingA single tertiary care surgical centre.PatientsWe enrolled 2046 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with anticipated tracheal intubation.InterventionPrior to surgery, patients had their NLV ratio and standard airway measures recorded. The anaesthesiologist who performed the intubation was blind to the airway assessment and recorded the best view of the larynx according to the Cormack and Lehane scale. Difficult laryngoscopy was defined as a grade 3 or 4 view.Main Outcome MeasureThe main outcome measure was the sensitivity and specificity of the NLV ratio measurement for predicting difficult laryngoscopy.ResultsReceiver operating characteristics curve analysis of the NLV ratio revealed an optimal sensitivity of only 41% and specificity of 77%.ConclusionAlthough our novel measurement performed similarly to traditional bedside predictors of difficult laryngoscopy, the sensitivity was too low for the test to be clinically useful. Numerous factors which may be very difficult to predict at the bedside probably contributed to the poor performance of this novel measurement.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.