-
- Sheng Shi, Xin-Feng Li, Qi-Tong Zhao, Li-Li Yang, Zu-De Liu, and Wen Yuan.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
- World Neurosurg. 2016 Nov 1; 95: 148-155.
ObjectiveTo determine any differences in self-reported dysphagia in patients treated with single-level anterior cervical decompression with different zero-profile implants (arthroplasty vs. arthrodesis) and identify risk factors for postoperative dysphagia.MethodsA total of 112 patients with 1-level cervical degenerative disc disease were included in the prospective study. The dysphagia conditions and radiologic results were assessed using Bazar dysphagia scoring system, the Swallowing Quality of Life scores, cervical alignment (CA), segmental angle, and prevertebral soft tissues swelling (PSTS). All these parameters were compared before and after surgery in the respective group, which were also compared between the 2 groups. Correlations between the confounding factors and postoperative dysphagia were analyzed.ResultsNo significant differences existed in preoperative or initially postoperative dysphagia rate and scores between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). However, the dysphagia rate and scores of cervical disc arthroplasty was better than those of fusion at postoperative day 7. Heavy smoker, PSTS change (≥5 mm), or CA change (≥5 degrees) was prone to have postoperative dysphagia.ConclusionsPostoperative dysphagia remains a common incidence, despite advances in instrumentation technologies. However, cervical disc arthroplasty is superior to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in ameliorating the symptom of dysphagia in the early postoperative term. Heavy smoker, PSTS change (≥5 mm), and CA change (≥5 degrees) were important predictors of postoperative dysphagia.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.