• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Oct 2016

    Comparative Study

    Pressure-regulated volume control vs. volume control ventilation in healthy and injured rabbit lung: An experimental study.

    • Liisa Porra, Sam Bayat, Iliona Malaspinas, Gergely Albu, Camille Doras, Ludovic Broche, Satu Strengell, Ferenc Peták, and Walid Habre.
    • From the Department of Physics, University of Helsinki (LP, SS), Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (LP, SS), Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Inserm U1105 and Paediatric Lung Function Laboratory, CHU Amiens, Amiens, France (SB, LB), Anesthesiological Investigation Unit, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (IM, GA, CD), Biomedical Beamline-ID17, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France (LB), Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary (FP), Geneva Children's Hospital, University Hospitals of Geneva and Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland (WH).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct 1; 33 (10): 767-75.

    BackgroundIt is not well understood how different ventilation modes affect the regional distribution of ventilation, particularly within the injured lung.ObjectivesWe compared respiratory mechanics, lung aeration and regional specific ventilation ((Equation is included in full-text article.)) distributions in healthy and surfactant-depleted rabbits ventilated with pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) mode with a decelerating inspiratory flow or with volume control (VC) mode.DesignRandomised experimental study.Animals And InterventionsNew Zealand white rabbits (n = 8) were anaesthetised, paralysed and mechanically ventilated either with VC or PRVC mode (tidal volume: 7 ml kg; rate: 40 min; positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP): 3 cmH2O), at baseline and after lung injury induced by lung lavage.Main Outcome MeasuresAirway resistance (Raw), respiratory tissue damping (G) and elastance (H) were measured by low-frequency forced oscillations. Synchrotron radiation computed tomography during stable xenon wash-in was used to measure regional lung aeration and specific ventilation and the relative fraction of nonaerated, trapped, normally, poorly and hyperinflated lung regions.ResultsLung lavage significantly elevated peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) (P < 0.001). PIP was lower on PRVC compared with VC mode (-12.7 ± 1.7%, P < 0.001). No significant differences in respiratory mechanics, regional ventilation distribution, strain or blood oxygenation could be detected between the two ventilation modes.ConclusionA decelerating flow pattern (PRVC) resulted in equivalent regional ventilation distribution, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange, in both normal and mechanically heterogeneous lungs with, however, a significantly lower peak pressure. Our data suggest that the lower PIP on PRVC ventilation was because of the decelerating flow pattern rather than the ventilation distribution.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.