• Gastrointest. Endosc. · Nov 2011

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Participation by experienced endoscopy nurses increases the detection rate of colon polyps during a screening colonoscopy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study.

    • Chang Kyun Lee, Dong Il Park, Suck-Ho Lee, Young Hwangbo, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Soo Han, Jae Myung Cha, Bo-In Lee, and Jeong Eun Shin.
    • Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
    • Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011 Nov 1; 74 (5): 1094-102.

    BackgroundNo reported prospective, randomized study has evaluated the impact of an endoscopy nurse participating as a second observer during colonoscopy.ObjectiveTo determine whether the participation of an endoscopy nurse enhanced the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) during screening colonoscopy.DesignMulticenter, prospective, randomized study.SettingAcademic hospitals.PatientsA total of 844 consecutive patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.InterventionsSingle observation by colonoscopist or dual observation by colonoscopist and endoscopy nurse during colonoscope withdrawal.Main Outcome MeasurementsPDR and ADR.ResultsNo significant difference in patient demographic data, adequacy of bowel preparation, or mean withdrawal time was observed between the 2 groups. In total, 1153 polyps, including 762 adenomas, were detected in 791 patients. Seven nonpolypoid, depressed neoplastic lesions (0-IIc or combined types) were only detected in the dual observation group. A multivariate analysis revealed that experienced (≥ 2 years) endoscopy nurse participation significantly increased the PDR and ADR compared with those in the single observation group by a colonoscopist alone (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.58 [95% CI, 1.07-2.32]; adjusted OR 1.47 [95% CI, 1.01-2.12], respectively). Additionally, the PDR was significantly higher in the dual-observation group with fellows (<500 colonoscopies) and an experienced endoscopy nurse versus that in the single observation group (adjusted OR 2.07 [95% CI, 1.15-3.74]). There was no significant benefit of experienced nurse participation in the subgroup with experienced colonoscopists.LimitationsAbsence of colonoscopist blinding.ConclusionsExperienced endoscopy nurse participation increased the PDR and ADR during screening colonoscopy. However, the benefit of participation by experienced nurses appears to be exclusively with inexperienced colonoscopists.Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.