• Gastrointest. Endosc. · Aug 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.

    • George Ou, Edward Kim, Pardis Lakzadeh, Jessica Tong, Robert Enns, Alnoor Ramji, Scott Whittaker, Hin Hin Ko, Brian Bressler, Lawrence Halparin, Eric Lam, Jack Amar, and Jennifer Telford.
    • Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
    • Gastrointest. Endosc. 2014 Aug 1; 80 (2): 277-83.

    BackgroundHigh-quality colonoscope withdrawal technique is associated with a higher adenoma detection rate. Position change is routinely used in barium enema and CT colonography to facilitate adequate distension of the colon and promote movement of fluid from the segment of the colon being assessed.ObjectiveTo determine whether prescribed position changes during colonoscope withdrawal affect the adenoma detection rate compared with the usual care per endoscopist.DesignProspective, randomized, controlled trial.SettingTertiary-care, university-affiliated hospital.PatientsPatients referred for outpatient colonoscopy between July 2011 and July 2012 were evaluated for eligibility. Inclusion criteria were outpatient status and age ≥40 years. Exclusion criteria were (1) complete colonoscopy within 1 year before the procedure, (2) inability to provide informed consent, (3) incomplete colonoscopy to the cecum, (4) previous bowel resection, (5) inflammatory bowel disease, (6) colonic polyposis syndrome, (7) inadequate bowel preparation, and (8) musculoskeletal disorder or other mobility issues limiting effective patient position changes during colonoscopy.InterventionsPrescribed position changes during colonoscope withdrawal.Main Outcome MeasurementsPolyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR).ResultsA total of 776 patients were enrolled, with 388 in the dynamic group. There was no difference in PDR (odds ratio [OR] 0.99; P = .93) or ADR (OR 1.17; P = .28). Colonoscope withdrawal time was longer in the dynamic group (median time 466.5 vs 422.5 seconds; P < .0001).LimitationsSingle-center study. Indication for procedure not controlled. Lack of standardized bowel preparation and blinding.ConclusionPrescribed position changes during colonoscope withdrawal do not affect polyp/adenoma detection compared with the usual practice when the baseline ADR is above the recommended standard. (Clinical Trial Registration NumberNCT01395173.).Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.