• Dis. Colon Rectum · Nov 2015

    Surgical Site Infection Rates Following Implementation of a Colorectal Closure Bundle in Elective Colorectal Surgeries.

    • Amandeep Ghuman, Tiffany Chan, Ahmer A Karimuddin, Carl J Brown, Manoj J Raval, and P Terry Phang.
    • 1 Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 2 Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
    • Dis. Colon Rectum. 2015 Nov 1; 58 (11): 1078-82.

    BackgroundSurgical site infections of up to 27% are reported for colorectal surgery. Care bundles have been introduced to decrease surgical site infection rates, but are variable in composition.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine whether the addition of a "Colorectal Closure Bundle" in our Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway decreased surgical site infection rates.DesignThis is a retrospective study of elective colon resections before and after the addition of a closure bundle.SettingsThis study was conducted at a single academic institution.PatientsPatients undergoing consecutive elective colon resections with primary anastomosis, December 2012 to July 31, 2014, enrolled in our Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway. Exclusion criteria were stoma creation and closure and preoperative chemoradiation.InterventionThe "Colorectal Closure Bundle," which includes a change in gown and gloves, redraping, wound lavage, and a new set of instruments for closure, was added to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway.Main Outcome MeasureThe primary outcome measured was surgical site infections as defined by CDC criteria.ResultsTwo hundred five patients were reviewed, 111 preintervention and 94 postintervention. Overall surgical site infection rates were 25.2% preintervention vs 26.6% postintervention (p = 0.82). Surgical site infections were subdivided into "superficial" and "deep and organ space" and were 14.4% and 10.8% preintervention vs 14.9% and 11.7% postintervention (p = not significant). Smoking and diabetes mellitus were found to be independently associated with surgical site infections on multivariate analysis, with adjusted odds ratios of 4.32 (95% CI, 1.70-10.94), p = 0.002, and 2.87 (95% CI 1.30-6.34), p = 0.009.LimitationsLimitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the small sample size.ConclusionsThere was no change in surgical site infection rates after implementation of the "Colorectal Closure Bundle." Smoking and diabetes mellitus were the only significant risk factors associated with increased surgical site infections. Our infection rates remain high and further change in our perioperative protocol is needed.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.