-
Multicenter Study
Interobserver reliability of the chest radiograph in community-acquired pneumonia. PORT Investigators.
- M N Albaum, L C Hill, M Murphy, Y H Li, C R Fuhrman, C A Britton, W N Kapoor, and M J Fine.
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Chest. 1996 Aug 1; 110 (2): 343-50.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the interobserver reliability of pulmonary radiographic findings in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).DesignA prospective, multicenter study.SettingPhysician offices, medical walk-in clinics, emergency departments, and inpatient wards affiliated with three university hospitals, one community hospital, and one staff model health maintenance organization in three geographic areas.MethodsCopies of the initial chest radiograph of patients suspected of having CAP were independently read by two staff radiologists at the coordinating university hospital. Interobserver reliability for the interpretation for radiographic findings was assessed by calculation of agreement rates and the kappa statistic.ParticipantsAdults (age > or = 18 years) with symptoms or signs of CAP and a pulmonary radiographic infiltrate documented by a local study site radiologist.ResultsAmong the 282 patients whose initial pulmonary radiographs were evaluated, there was agreement between the two staff radiologists on the presence of infiltrate in 79.4% and on the absence of an infiltrate in 6.0% (kappa = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.22 to 0.52). For the 224 patients with an infiltrate identified by both radiologists, there was further agreement that the infiltrate was unilobar in 41.5% and multilobar in 33.9% (kappa = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.62), pleural effusion was present in 10.7% and absent in 73.2% (kappa = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.50), and the infiltrate was alveolar in 96.3% of patients and interstitial in no patients (kappa = -0.01; 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.00). Among the 210 patients with an alveolar infiltrate, both radiologists classified the infiltrate as lobar in 74.6% and bronchopneumonia in 2.4% (kappa = 0.09; 95% CI = -0.04 to 0.22), and agreed on the presence of air bronchograms in 7.6% and their absence in 52.9% (kappa = 0.01; 95% CI = -0.13 to 0.15).ConclusionIn patients with CAP, two university radiologists identified the presence of infiltrate, multilobar disease, and pleural effusion with fair to good interobserver reliability. However, interobserver reliability for the pattern of infiltrate and the presence of air bronchograms was poor.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.