• N Sakai, M Nakatsuka, and T Tomita.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan. sakayline@gmail.com.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Nov 1; 60 (10): 1461-1469.

BackgroundContinuous femoral nerve block (cFNB) induces quadriceps muscle weakness, but patient-controlled femoral nerve block (PCFNB) can provide analgesia with lower consumption of local anesthetics compared to cFNB. We hypothesized that cFNB followed by PCFNB leads to accelerated recovery of quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty compared to cFNB alone. Secondary outcomes were local anesthetic consumption, pain, and mobilization.MethodsFifty-six subjects received post-operative cFNB for 24 h and then randomized to receive either cFNB (basal infusion of 6 ml/h using a dummy bolus button; n = 27) or PCFNB (bolus infusion of 3 ml with a lockout time of 30 min and no basal infusion; n = 29) using 0.08% levobupivacaine for the subsequent 24 h in a double-blind manner (registration: UMIN000010105). Quadriceps strength was assessed using a hand-held dynamometer. The percentage change from baseline was compared between groups.ResultsQuadriceps strength at 48 h was 47.3 ± 18.3% in the cFNB group and 49.7 ± 15.7% in the PCFNB group (95% confidence interval -7.0-11.9%, P = 0.61). Local anesthetic consumption during the post-operative period was significantly lower in the PCFNB group compared to the cFNB group (102 ± 10.8 ml vs.146 ± 4.6 ml; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in any of the other outcomes, including pain scores at rest and during knee rehabilitation.ConclusionContinuous femoral nerve block followed by PCFNB does not improve quadriceps strength recovery time compared to cFNB alone after total knee arthroplasty, but similar analgesic effects were demonstrated with reduced levobupivacaine consumption.© 2016 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

39 keywords...

hide…