• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Sep 2012

    Comparative Study

    Pulmonary artery vs. transpulmonary thermodilution for the assessment of cardiac output in mitral regurgitation: a prospective observational study.

    • Klaus Staier, Markus Wilhelm, Christoph Wiesenack, Martin Thoma, and Cornelius Keyl.
    • Department of Anaesthesiology, Heart Centre Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany.
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Sep 1;29(9):431-7.

    ContextWith increasing prevalence of mitral regurgitation, even noncardiac anaesthesiologists will be confronted by this disorder and will need to be familiar with the extended haemodynamic monitoring required. The assessment of cardiac output (CO) measured by transpulmonary thermodilution (COTP) has become an accepted alternative to the CO measured by thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter (COPAC). However, the integrity of COTP in severe mitral regurgitation requires systematic evaluation.ObjectiveThis study was designed to test the hypothesis that transpulmonary thermodilution is compromised by severe mitral regurgitation.DesignProspective method comparison study.SettingSingle university-affiliated hospital.ParticipantsThirty patients with mitral regurgitation undergoing elective mitral valve repair.Main Outcome MeasureCOTP and COPAC were determined in triplicate after induction of anaesthesia, and at the end of surgery after closure of the chest. The methods were compared using bias and precision statistics.ResultsEchocardiography revealed severe mitral regurgitation in most patients (n  =  27) after induction of anaesthesia. The least significant change in COTP (the minimum change in COTP required to detect a real change with a probability of 95%) was increased under the condition of mitral regurgitation (15.4  ±  10.2% after anaesthesia induction vs. 9.3  ±  5.9% after valve repair, P = 0.008), whereas it remained constant in COPAC (9.6  ±  5.4 vs. 8.5  ±  7.2%, P = 0.55). There was no significant bias between COTP and COPAC after anaesthesia induction [mean CO, 4.03 ± 0.92 l  min; bias 0.12 l  min (95% confidence interval, CI, -0.073 to 0.311)], and after valve repair [mean CO 7.47  ±  1.44 l  min; bias 0.045 l  min (95% CI, -0.147 to 0.237)]. The percentage error was 28.4 and 13.6%, respectively.ConclusionThe results suggest that even severe mitral regurgitation has no significant impact on the accuracy of COTP. The precision of COTP was reduced under the condition of mitral regurgitation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.