• Michael G Usher, Christine Fanning, Di Wu, Christine Muglia, Karen Balonze, Deborah Kim, Amay Parikh, and Dana Herrigel.
• Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Electronic address: mgusher@umn.edu.
• J Crit Care. 2016 Dec 1; 36: 240-245.

PurposePatients transferred between hospitals are at high risk of adverse events and mortality. This study aims to identify which components of the transfer handoff process are important predictors of adverse events and mortality.Materials And MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational study of 335 consecutive patient transfers to 3 intensive care units at an academic tertiary referral center. We assessed the relationship between handoff documentation completeness and patient outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, duplication of labor, disposition error, and length of stay.ResultsTransfer documentation was frequently absent with overall completeness of 58.3%. Adverse events occurred in 42% of patients within 24 hours of arrival, with an overall in-hospital mortality of 17.3%. Higher documentation completeness was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02 to 0.38; P = .002), reduced adverse events (coefficient, -2.08; 95% CI, -2.76 to -1.390; P < .001), and reduced duplication of labor (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.88; P = .033) when controlling for severity of illness.ConclusionsDocumentation completeness is associated with improved outcomes and resource utilization in patients transferred between hospitals.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

5 keywords...

hide…