• Lindsay E Kuo, Kenric Murayama, Kristina D Simmons, and Rachel R Kelz.
• *Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA †Department of Surgery, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.
• Ann. Surg. 2017 Mar 1; 265 (3): 514-520.

ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to examine regional variation in use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) operations.Summary Background DataRegional variation exists in performance of surgical operations. Variation in the use of MIS has not been studied.MethodsFive operations that are performed open or MIS were selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric. A 3-state database from 2008 to 2011 was used; states were divided into hospital service areas (HSAs). For each operation, the percentage of MIS operations was calculated. HSAs with less than 50% or more than 150% of the MIS average were considered outliers. Population demographics, geography, and hospital and physician presence were compared between HSAs. Rates of performance by patient disease and the presence of MIS surgeons were also investigated.ResultsMIS cholecystectomy was performed with low variation; MIS appendectomy, antireflux, and bariatric operations with medium variation; and MIS colectomy with high variation. With the exception of MIS colectomy, there were no differences in the patient demographics, geography, or disease types treated with an MIS approach between HSAs with low-, non-, or high utilization of MIS. There is no correlation between the number of MIS surgeons and the percentage of procedures performed MIS.ConclusionsVariation in utilization of MIS exists and differs by operation. Patient demographics, patient disease, and the ability to access care are associated only with variation in use of MIS for colectomy. For all other operations studied, these factors do not explain variation in MIS use. Further investigation is warranted to identify and eliminate causes of variation.

41 keywords...

hide…