-
Critical care medicine · Apr 2017
Multicenter StudyImproving ICU-Based Palliative Care Delivery: A Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Survey of Critical Care Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs.
- Nicholas G Wysham, May Hua, Catherine L Hough, Stephanie Gundel, Sharron L Docherty, Derek M Jones, Owen Reagan, Haley Goucher, Jessica Mcfarlin, and Christopher E Cox.
- 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.3Department of Anesthesia, Columbia University, New York, NY.4Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.5School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC.6Division of Neurointensive Care, Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC.7Palliative Care Medicine Program, Duke University, Durham, NC.8Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
- Crit. Care Med. 2017 Apr 1; 45 (4): e372-e378.
ObjectiveAddressing the quality gap in ICU-based palliative care is limited by uncertainty about acceptable models of collaborative specialist and generalist care. Therefore, we characterized the attitudes of physicians and nurses about palliative care delivery in an ICU environment.DesignMixed-methods study.SettingMedical and surgical ICUs at three large academic hospitals.ParticipantsThree hundred three nurses, intensivists, and advanced practice providers.Measurements And Main ResultsClinicians completed written surveys that assessed attitudes about specialist palliative care presence and integration into the ICU setting, as well as acceptability of 23 published palliative care prompts (triggers) for specialist consultation. Most (n = 225; 75%) reported that palliative care consultation was underutilized. Prompting consideration of eligibility for specialist consultation by electronic health record searches for triggers was most preferred (n = 123; 41%); only 17 of them (6%) felt current processes were adequate. The most acceptable specialist triggers were metastatic malignancy, unrealistic goals of care, end of life decision making, and persistent organ failure. Advanced age, length of stay, and duration of life support were the least acceptable. Screening led by either specialists or ICU teams was equally preferred. Central themes derived from qualitative analysis of 65 written responses to open-ended items included concerns about the roles of physicians and nurses, implementation, and impact on ICU team-family relationships.ConclusionsIntegration of palliative care specialists in the ICU is broadly acceptable and desired. However, the most commonly used current triggers for prompting specialist consultation were among the least well accepted, while more favorable triggers are difficult to abstract from electronic health record systems. There is also disagreement about the role of ICU nurses in palliative care delivery. These findings provide important guidance to the development of collaborative care models for the ICU setting.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.