• Annals of surgery · Mar 2017

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    To Drain or Not to Drain Infraperitoneal Anastomosis After Rectal Excision for Cancer: The GRECCAR 5 Randomized Trial.

    • Quentin Denost, Philippe Rouanet, Jean-Luc Faucheron, Yves Panis, Bernard Meunier, Eddy Cotte, Guillaume Meurette, Sylvain Kirzin, Charles Sabbagh, Jèrôme Loriau, Stèphane Benoist, Christophe Mariette, Igor Sielezneff, Bernard Lelong, François Mauvais, Benoit Romain, Marie-Line Barussaud, Christine Germain, Marie-Quitterie Picat, Eric Rullier, Christophe Laurent, and French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR).
    • *Colorectal Unit, Haut Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France †University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France ‡Surgical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France §Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Michallon University Hospital, Grenoble, France ¶University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France ||Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP), Paris VII University, Clichy, France **Department of Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France ††Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital Center Lyon-Sud, University of Lyon, Lyon, France ‡‡Department of Surgery, Hotel Dieu University Hospital, Nantes, France §§Department of Surgery, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France ¶¶Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Amiens Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France ||||Inserm Unit, Picardie Jules-Verne University, Amiens, France ***Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris, France †††Department of Surgery, Bicêtre University Hospital (AP-HP), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex, France ‡‡‡Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, UniversityLille, Lille, France §§§Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University of Aix Marseille, Marseille, France ¶¶¶Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France ||||||Department of Digestive Surgery, Beauvais Hospital, Beauvais, France ****Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France ††††Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France ‡‡‡‡Medical Information Department, USMR, CHU de Bordeaux-Public health pole, Bordeaux, France §§§§INSERM, ISPED, INSERM Center U897-Epidemiology-Biostatistic, Bordeaux, France ¶¶¶¶ISPED, INSERM U897 Center-Epidemiology-Biostatistic, University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
    • Ann. Surg. 2017 Mar 1; 265 (3): 474-480.

    ObjectiveTo assess the effect of pelvic drainage after rectal surgery for cancer.BackgroundPelvic sepsis is one of the major complications after rectal excision for rectal cancer. Although many studies have confirmed infectiveness of drainage after colectomy, there is still a controversy after rectal surgery.MethodsThis multicenter randomized trial with 2 parallel arms (drain vs no drain) was performed between 2011 and 2014. Primary endpoint was postoperative pelvic sepsis within 30 postoperative days, including anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, and peritonitis. Secondary endpoints were overall morbidity and mortality, rate of reoperation, length of hospital stay, and rate of stoma closure at 6 months.ResultsA total of 494 patients were randomized, 25 did not meet the criteria and 469 were analyzed: 236 with drain and 233 without. The anastomotic height was 3.5 ± 1.9 cm from the anal verge. The rate of pelvic sepsis was 17.1% (80/469) and was similar between drain and no drain: 16.1% versus 18.0% (P = 0.58). There was no difference of surgical morbidity (18.7% vs 25.3%; P = 0.83), rate of reoperation (16.6% vs 21.0%; P = 0.22), length of hospital stay (12.2 vs 12.2; P = 0.99) and rate of stoma closure (80.1% vs 77.3%; P = 0.53) between groups. Absence of colonic pouch was the only independent factor of pelvic sepsis (odds ratio = 1.757; 95% confidence interval 1.078-2.864; P = 0.024).ConclusionsThis randomized trial suggests that the use of a pelvic drain after rectal excision for rectal cancer did not confer any benefit to the patient.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…