• Ann. Thorac. Surg. · Sep 2012

    Comparative Study

    Should orthotopic heart transplantation using marginal donors be limited to higher volume centers?

    • Arman Kilic, Eric S Weiss, Jeremiah G Allen, Timothy J George, David D Yuh, Ashish S Shah, and John V Conte.
    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
    • Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2012 Sep 1; 94 (3): 695-702.

    BackgroundThis study examined whether institutional volume impacts outcomes after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) utilizing marginal donors.MethodsAdult patients undergoing OHT with the use of marginal donors between 2000 and 2010 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. A previously derived and validated donor risk score (range, 1 to 15) was used to define marginal donors as those in the 90th percentile of risk (score≥7). Patients were stratified into equal-size tertiles based on overall institutional OHT volume. Posttransplant outcomes were compared between these center cohorts.ResultsA total of 3,176 OHTs utilizing marginal donors were identified. In Cox regression analysis, recipients undergoing OHT at low-volume centers were at significantly increased risk of 30-day (hazard ratio 1.82 [1.31 to 2.54], p<0.001), 1-year (hazard ratio 1.40 [1.14 to 1.73], p=0.002), and 5-year posttransplant mortality (hazard ratio 1.29 [1.10 to 1.52], p=0.02). These findings persisted after adjusting for recipient risk, differences in donor risk score, and year of transplantation (each p<0.05). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was a similar trend of decreasing 1-year survival with decreasing center volume: high (86.0%), intermediate (85.7%), and low (81.2%; log rank p=0.003). Drug-treated rejection within the first post-OHT year was more common in low-volume versus high-volume centers (34.3% versus 24.2%, p<0.001). At an overall mean follow-up of 3.4±2.9 years, low-volume centers also had higher incidences of death due to malignancy (2.8% versus 1.3%, p=0.01) or infection (6.2% versus 4.1%, p=0.02).ConclusionsConsolidating the use of marginal donors to higher volume centers may be prudent in improving post-OHT outcomes in this higher risk patient subset.Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…