-
Journal of critical care · Feb 2017
Impact of hospital case-volume on subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes: A nationwide analysis adjusting for hemorrhage severity.
- Barret Rush, Kali Romano, Mohammad Ashkanani, Robert C McDermid, and Leo Anthony Celi.
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Room 2438, Jim Pattison Pavilion, 2nd Floor, 855 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1M9; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115. Electronic address: bar890@mail.harvard.edu.
- J Crit Care. 2017 Feb 1; 37: 240-243.
ObjectiveThere have been suggestions that patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) have a better outcome when treated in high-volume centers. Much of the published literature on the subject is limited by an inability to control for severity of SAH.MethodsThis is a nationwide retrospective cohort analysis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). The NIS Subarachnoid Severity Scale was used to adjust for severity of SAH in multivariate logistic regression modeling.ResultsThe records of 47 911 414 hospital admissions from the 2006-2011 NIS samples were examined. There were 11 607 patients who met inclusion criteria for the study. Of these, 7787 (67.0%) were treated at a high-volume center compared with 3820 (32.9%) treated at a low-volume center. Patients treated at high-volume centers compared with low-volume centers were more likely to receive endovascular aneurysm control (58.5% vs 51.2%, P=.04), be transferred from another hospital (35.4% vs 19.7%, P<.01), be treated in a teaching facility (97.3% vs 72.9%, P<.01), and have a longer length of stay (14.9 days [interquartile range 10.3-21.7] vs 13.9 days [interquartile range, 8.9-20.1], P<.01). After adjustment for all baseline covariates, including severity of SAH, treatment in a high-volume center was associated with an odds ratio for death of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.95; P<.01) and a higher odds of a good functional outcome (odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.28; P<.01).ConclusionAfter adjustment for severity of SAH, treatment in a high-volume center was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality and a higher odds of a good functional outcome.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.