• Daniel J Durand, Anand K Narayan, Frank J Rybicki, Judy Burleson, Paul Nagy, Geraldine McGinty, and Richard Duszak.
• Evolent Health, Arlington, Virginia. Electronic address: daniel.j.durand@gmail.com.
• J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jan 1; 12 (1): 51-8.

AbstractThe US health care system is in the midst of disruptive changes intended to expand access, improve outcomes, and lower costs. As part of this movement, a growing number of stakeholders have advocated dramatically increasing consumer transparency into the quality and price of health care services. The authors review the general movement toward American health care value transparency within the public, private, and nonprofit sectors, with an emphasis on those initiatives most relevant to radiology. They conclude that radiology, along with other "ancillary services," has been a major focus of early efforts to enhance consumer price transparency. By contrast, radiology as a field remains in the "middle of the pack" with regard to quality transparency. There is thus the danger that radiology value transparency in its current form will stimulate primarily price-based competition, erode provider profit margins, and disincentivize quality. The authors conclude with suggested actions radiologists can take to ensure that a more optimal balance is struck between quality transparency and price transparency, one that will enable true value-based competition among radiologists rather than commoditization.Copyright © 2015 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…