• J Clin Pharmacol · Oct 1997

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    Tolerance and efficacy of polyethylene glycol 3350/electrolyte solution versus lactulose in relieving opiate induced constipation: a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.

    • M D Freedman, H J Schwartz, R Roby, and S Fleisher.
    • Department of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
    • J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Oct 1; 37 (10): 904-7.

    AbstractChronicity and high therapeutic cost prompted this study to determine a cost-effective and efficacious regimen in treating narcotic-induced constipation. The efficacy of lactulose was compared with polyethylene glycol 3350/electrolyte solution for relief of methadone-induced constipation. This was a randomized, triple cross-over after control run-in (no treatment) study conducted at a methadone maintenance program in Baltimore, Maryland in 57 patients who are affected by opiate-induced constipation. The study was measured by self-reported frequencies, consistency, and ease of defecation during a 1 week run-in control period, followed by 3 treatment phases of 2 weeks each. Polyethylene glycol 3350/electrolyte solution and lactulose produced more "nonhard" stools than the placebo (P < 0.01) and control (P < 0.003). Polyethylene glycol 3350/electrolyte solution produced the loosest stool (P < 0.0001) compared with the control, whereas lactulose had the most adverse effects. There were no significant differences in reducing hard stool formation in either experimental group, but both were better than having nothing or just the placebo. Polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution resulted in the loosest (diarrheal) stool. It is also likely that polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution is the most cost effective.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…