• Robert F Tamburro, Tammara L Jenkins, and Patrick M Kochanek.
• 1Pediatric Trauma and Critical Illness Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.2Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Anesthesiology, Pediatrics, Bioengineering, and Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
• Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2016 Nov 1; 17 (11): e539-e542.

ObjectiveTo summarize the scientific priorities and potential future research directions for pediatric critical care research discussed by a panel of experts at the inaugural Strategic Planning Conference of the Pediatric Trauma and Critical Illness Branch of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Data SourcesExpert opinion expressed during the Strategic Planning Conference.Study SelectionNot applicable.Data ExtractionChaired by an experienced expert from the field, issues relevant to the conduct of pediatric critical care research were discussed and debated by the invited participants.Data SynthesisCommon themes and suggested priorities were identified and coalesced.ConclusionsOf the many pathophysiologic conditions discussed, the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome emerged as a topic in need of more study that is most relevant to the field. Additionally, the experts offered that the interrelationship and impact of critical illness on child development and family functioning are important research priorities. Consequently, long-term outcomes research was encouraged. The expert group also suggested that multidisciplinary conferences are needed to help identify key knowledge gaps to advance and direct research in the field. The Pediatric Critical Care and Trauma Scientist Development National K12 Program and the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network were recognized as successful and important programs supported by the branch. The development of core data resources including biorepositories with robust phenotypic data using common data elements was also suggested to foster data sharing among investigators and to enhance disease diagnosis and discovery. Multicenter clinical trials and innovative study designs to address understudied and poorly understood conditions were considered important for field advancement. Finally, the growth of the pediatric critical care research workforce was offered as a priority that could be spawned in many ways including by expanded transdisciplinary and multiprofessional collaboration and diversity representation.

14 keywords...

hide…