• Endoscopy · Nov 2015

    Comparative Study

    Comparing outcome of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's with high grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: a prospective multicenter UK registry.

    • Rehan J Haidry, Gideon Lipman, Matthew R Banks, Mohammed A Butt, Vinay Sehgal, David Graham, Jason M Dunn, Abhinav Gupta, Rami Sweis, Haroon Miah, Danielle Morris, Howard L Smart, Pradeep Bhandari, Robert Willert, Grant Fullarton, Jonathon Morris, Massimo Di Pietro, Charles Gordon, Ian Penman, High Barr, Praful Patel, Philip Boger, Neil Kapoor, Brinder Mahon, Jonathon Hoare, Ravi Narayanasamy, Dermot O'Toole, Edward Cheong, Natalie C Direkze, Yeng Ang, Andrew Veitch, Anjan Dhar, David Nyalender, Krish Ragunath, Anthony Leahy, Mark Fullard, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Marco Novelli, and Laurence B Lovat.
    • Research Department of Tissue and Energy, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
    • Endoscopy. 2015 Nov 1; 47 (11): 980-7.

    Background And Study AimMucosal neoplasia arising in Barrett's esophagus can be successfully treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with high grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal cancer (IMC) at baseline from the United Kingdom RFA registry.Patients And MethodsPrior to RFA, visible lesions and nodularity were removed entirely by EMR. Thereafter, patients underwent RFA every 3 months until all visible Barrett's mucosa was ablated or cancer developed (end points). Biopsies were taken at 12 months or when end points were reached.ResultsA total of 515 patients, 384 with HGD and 131 with IMC, completed treatment. Prior to RFA, EMR was performed for visible lesions more frequently in the IMC cohort than in HGD patients (77 % vs. 47 %; P < 0.0001). The 12-month complete response for dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia were almost identical in the two cohorts (HGD 88 % and 76 %, respectively; IMC 87 % and 75 %, respectively; P = 0.7). Progression to invasive cancer was not significantly different at 12 months (HGD 1.8 %, IMC 3.8 %; P = 0.19). A trend towards slightly worse medium-term durability may be emerging in IMC patients (P = 0.08). In IMC, EMR followed by RFA was definitely associated with superior durability compared with RFA alone (P = 0.01).ConclusionThe Registry reports on endoscopic therapy for Barrett's neoplasia, representing real-life outcomes. Patients with IMC were more likely to have visible lesions requiring initial EMR than those with HGD, and may carry a higher risk of cancer progression in the medium term. The data consolidate the approach to ensuring that these patients undergo thorough endoscopic work-up, including EMR prior to RFA when necessary.© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.