• R Kearns, A Macfarlane, A Grant, K Puxty, P Harrison, M Shaw, K Anderson, and J Kinsella.
• Glasgow Royal Infirmary Campus, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
• Anaesthesia. 2016 Dec 1; 71 (12): 1431-1440.

AbstractWe performed a single centre, double blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority study comparing ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block with spinal morphine for the primary outcome of 24-h postoperative morphine consumption in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia with levobupivacaine. One hundred and eight patients were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block with 2 mg.kg-1 levobupivacaine (fascia iliaca group) or spinal morphine 100 μg plus a sham ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block using saline (spinal morphine group). The pre-defined non-inferiority margin was a median difference between the groups of 10 mg in cumulative intravenous morphine use in the first 24 h postoperatively. Patients in the fascia iliaca group received 25 mg more intravenous morphine than patients in the spinal morphine group (95% CI 9.0-30.5 mg, p < 0.001). Ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block was significantly worse than spinal morphine in the provision of analgesia in the first 24 h after total hip arthroplasty. No increase in side-effects was noted in the spinal morphine group but the study was not powered to investigate all secondary outcomes.© 2016 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

29 keywords...

hide…