-
Comparative Study
A secure and rapid method for orotracheal intubation of laboratory rats utilising handy instruments.
- Chieh-Shou Su, Hui-Chin Lai, Wen-Lieng Lee, Chih-Tai Ting, Ya-Ling Yang, Hsio-Wei Lee, Lee-Chuan Wang, Chu-Ying Peng, Kuo-Yang Wang, and Tsun-Jui Liu.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
- Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Nov 1;29(11):515-9.
ContextTracheal intubation of anaesthetised rats for laboratory experiments remains an essential yet challenging procedure.ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate whether tracheal intubation can be safely and securely accomplished in laboratory rats employing only handy instruments and with minimal experience.DesignThe feasibility and safety of a modified orotracheal intubation method was evaluated in rats undergoing open-chest surgery as part of another research protocol, and compared with an existing technique.SettingThe study was carried out in a tertiary medical centre-affiliated animal laboratory.AnimalsEighty-five rats weighing 250 to 350 g anaesthetised with intraperitoneal pentobarbital (60 mg kg(-1)).InterventionsOrotracheal intubation was performed on 35 animals (group Jou) using a previously reported technique and then on another 50 rats (group New) using the modified method employing a 3-ml syringe-derived intubation wedge, a 0.025-inch guidewire and a 16-gauge 45-mm-long intravenous catheter.Main Outcome MeasuresThe time for completion, the number of attempts and the incidence of difficulties and complications were recorded. The intubated tracheas were subsequently examined macroscopically and microscopically to determine position of the intubation catheter and the integrity of epithelial lining.ResultsCompared with the previous technique, the new method was completed more rapidly (1 ± 0.2 vs. 5 ± 2.4 min; P < 0.001), more smoothly (difficulties encountered in 8 vs. 74%; P < 0.001), with greater overall success (100 vs. 86%; P=0.022) and with fewer attempts [1 (1 to 1) vs. 2 (2 to 4); P < 0.001) for the new and Jou techniques, respectively, and with a lower incidence of procedure-related complications. Postmortem analysis confirmed there was no microscopic injury to the tracheal epithelial lining with the new technique in contrast to 57% in those using the Jou technique (P < 0.001).ConclusionTracheal intubation for laboratory rats can be securely and safely completed with the modified method employing a short learning curve and easily available devices.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.