• Elizabeth U Ujah, Lisa Bradshaw, David Fishwick, and Andrew D Curran.
• Health & Safety Executive, Field Operations Division, London, UK.
• Occup Med (Lond). 2004 May 1; 54 (3): 159-64.

AimsTo establish the nature, extent and organization of occupational health service provision for employees within the National Health Service (NHS) in London and to review the systems for monitoring performance.MethodsHuman resources directors and occupational health managers were contacted from a random selection of NHS trusts in the London area and invited to complete an interviewer-led questionnaire.ResultsAll seventeen trusts interviewed claimed to provide an occupational health service to their employees, with 88% providing this service in-house. The organization of the services varied, although most resided within the human resources function. Only 29% of the trusts could provide a written occupational health policy. Teaching hospital trusts had the most qualified and the highest numbers of medical staff. District/General hospital trusts had the least qualified clinical staff. Although most trusts were able to provide a comprehensive range of services, 87% of occupational health managers felt they could only provide a reactive service. Income was generated from non-NHS sources by 88% of the trusts and all were aware of NHS Plus. There was an indication that some trusts assigned NHS Plus status did not meet the standard of NHS Plus, although the survey took place only 3 months after the launch of NHS Plus.ConclusionsThere was a significant variation in the nature and extent of occupational health services in the NHS trusts. As a consequence, there may be differences in the level of occupational health service available to staff across the NHS in London.

12 keywords...

hide…