• H-T Klemm, A Naumann, G Hofmann, and G Spahn.
• Freies Institut für medizinische Begutachtungen, FIMB Bayreuth/Erlangen, Ludwigstraße 25, 95444, Bayreuth, Deutschland. dr.klemm@fimb.de.
• Unfallchirurg. 2017 Jan 1; 120 (1): 81-84.

AbstractAfter examining the causes of an accident the medical expert working in the area of private health care insurance under the general accident insurance (AUB) sample conditions must ascertain incapacity within a period of time that has been contractually agreed between the parties involved. In addition, this must also state their position on the question as to whether there may exist any circumstances up to the latest possible point in time in insurance terms that would comprise an adequate prognosis of a future change in the long-term condition. This requires a high probability. In contrast to scientifically based findings serving as a prognosis of osteoarthritis, in the case of endoprostheses forecasts can only be based on medical experience, which in this case has to satisfy the standard of proof of a high level of probability, since necessary replacement operations after insertion of a prosthesis are sufficiently probable. The prosthesis supplements that have been applied to date in the context of an assessment of prognosis have their justification. In applying them, however, it must be considered on one hand that this supplement is comprised of an equally weighted proportion for future risk and on the other hand a preventive portion. This increases in significance with different prostheses on one and the same limb.

14 keywords...

hide…