• R A Hakvoort, S D Thijs, F W Bouwmeester, A M Broekman, I M Ruhe, M M Vernooij, M P Burger, M H Emanuel, and J P Roovers.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands. rhakvoort@spaarneziekenhuis.nl
• BJOG. 2011 Aug 1; 118 (9): 1055-60.

ObjectiveTo compare clean intermittent catheterisation with transurethral indwelling catheterisation for the treatment of abnormal post-void residual bladder volume (PVR) following vaginal prolapse surgery.DesignMulticentre randomised controlled trial.SettingFive teaching hospitals and one non-teaching hospital in the Netherlands.PopulationAll patients older than 18 years experiencing abnormal PVR following vaginal prolapse surgery, with or without the use of mesh. Exclusion criteria were: any neurological or anxiety disorder, or the need for combined anti-incontinence surgery.MethodsAll patients were given an indwelling catheter directly after surgery, which was removed on the first postoperative day. Patients with a PVR of more than 150 ml after their first void were randomised for clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC), performed by nursing staff, or for transurethral indwelling catheterisation (TIC) for 3 days.Main Outcome MeasureBacteriuria rate at end of treatment.ResultsA total of 87 patients were included in the study. Compared with the TIC group (n = 42), there was a lower risk of developing bacteriuria (14 versus 38%; P = 0.02) or urinary tract infection (UTI; 12 versus 33%; P = 0.03) in the CIC group (n = 45); moreover, a shorter period of catheterisation was required (18 hours CIC versus 72 hours TIC; P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was similar in the two groups, and no adverse events occurred.ConclusionClean intermittent catheterisation is preferable over indwelling catheterisation for 3 days in the treatment of abnormal PVR following vaginal prolapse surgery.© 2011 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 RCOG.

22 keywords...

hide…