-
- Ralph C A Rippe, Martin den Heijer, and Saskia le Cessie.
- LUMC, afd. Klinische Epidemiologie, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013 Jan 1; 157 (18): A5539.
AbstractIn medical research missing data are sometimes inevitable. Different missingness mechanisms can be distinguished: (a) missing completely at random; (b) missing by design; (c) missing at random, and (d) missing not at random. If participants with missing data are excluded from statistical analyses, this can lead to biased study results and loss of statistical power. Imputation methods can be applied to estimate missing values; multiple imputation gives a good idea of the inaccuracy of the reconstructed measurements. The most common imputation methods assume that missing data are missing at random. Multiple imputation contributes greatly to the efficiency and reliability of estimates because maximum use is made of the data collected. Imputation is not meant to obviate low-quality data.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..