-
Intensive care medicine · Mar 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialEvaluation of patient skin breakdown and comfort with a new face mask for non-invasive ventilation: a multi-center study.
- Cesare Gregoretti, Marco Confalonieri, Paolo Navalesi, Vincenzo Squadrone, Pamela Frigerio, Fabio Beltrame, Giorgio Carbone, Giorgio Conti, Federica Gamna, Stefano Nava, Edoardo Calderini, Yoanna Skrobik, and Massimo Antonelli.
- Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera CTO-CRF-ICORMA, Via Zuretti 29, 10100 Turin, Italy. 3358394262@tim.it
- Intensive Care Med. 2002 Mar 1; 28 (3): 278-84.
ObjectiveTo evaluate patient comfort, skin breakdown and eye irritation when comparing a prototype face mask (PM) and conventional face masks (CMs) during non-invasive ventilation.Setting And DesignEight centers (intensive or intermediate care units). Multicenter randomized study.PopulationsPatients with acute respiratory failure of different etiologies.InterventionsPatients were randomized to CMs or PM when ventilation was expected to last at least 12 consecutive hours a day for two consecutive days. Patient comfort, skin breakdown and eye irritation, assessed by means of standardized scoring systems, were measured after 24 and 48 h and before discontinuing ventilation.ResultsHundred ninety-four patients were randomized. Forty-seven patients were finally enrolled: PM (24) and CMs (23). Ventilator settings were similar in the two groups at the beginning of the treatment and after 24 and 48 h. Skin breakdown was significantly higher in the CMs group over the study period ( p<0.001). Patient comfort was higher in the PM group after 24 and 48 h ( p=0.008 and p<0.001, respectively). Eye irritation was absent in both groups after 24 h and did not differ significantly after 48 h (p=0.539). Before ventilation was discontinued skin breakdown and patient comfort were significantly higher in the CMs group, when compared to the PM group ( p<0.001 and p=0.003, respectively). Eye irritation was slightly higher in the PM versus CMs group ( p=0.21). The time on ventilation was not significantly different between the two groups ( p=0.830).ConclusionThe PM significantly reduced skin breakdown while improving patient comfort, compared to the CMs.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.