• Garth H Utter, Joanne Cuny, Pradeep Sama, Michael R Silver, Patricia A Zrelak, Ruth Baron, Saskia E Drösler, and Patrick S Romano.
• Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA. garth.utter@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
• J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2010 Sep 1; 211 (3): 347-354.e1-29.

BackgroundPatient Safety Indicator (PSI) 11, or postoperative respiratory failure, was developed by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to detect incident cases of respiratory failure after elective operations through use of ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes. We sought to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of this indicator.Study DesignWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study, sampling consecutive cases that met PSI 11 criteria from 18 geographically diverse academic medical centers on or before June 30, 2007. Trained abstractors from each center reviewed medical records using a standard instrument. We assessed the PPV of the indicator (with 95% CI adjusted for clustering within centers) and conducted descriptive analyses of the cases.ResultsOf 609 cases that met PSI 11 criteria, 551 (90.5%; 95% CI, 86.5-94.4%) satisfied the technical criteria of the indicator and 507 (83.2%; 95% CI, 77.2-89.3%) represented true cases of postoperative respiratory failure from a clinical standpoint. The most frequent reasons for being falsely positive were nonelective hospitalization, prolonged intubation for airway protection, and insufficient evidence to support a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure. Fifty percent of true-positive cases involved substantial baseline comorbidities, and 23% resulted in death.ConclusionsAlthough PSI 11 predicts true postoperative respiratory failure with relatively high frequency, the indicator does not limit detection to preventable cases. The PPV of PSI 11 might be increased by excluding cases with a principal diagnosis suggestive of a nonelective hospitalization and those with head or neck procedures. Removing the diagnosis code criterion from the indicator might also increase PPV, but would decrease the number of true positive cases detected by 20%.Copyright 2010 American College of Surgeons. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…