• Toon Fm Boselie, Henk van Santbrink, Rob A de Bie, and Henk van Mameren.
• *Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands †Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
• Spine. 2016 Nov 22.

Study DesignA retrospective study in which, first, a definition of normal movement in the cervical spine is formulated. Second, use of this definition in differentiating between normal and abnormal movement of the cervical spine is evaluated.ObjectiveTo formulate a clear definition of the normal sequence of segmental contributions in the cervical spine during flexion/extension, and to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of sequence of segmental contributions analysis in differentiating between normal and abnormal movement of the cervical spine in healthy controls and patients with cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD).Summary Of Background DataTo study mobility before and after cervical arthroplasty, segmental range of motion (sROM) is most commonly used. Analysis of sequence of segmental contributions during flexion and/or extension might be more suitable.MethodsThe definition was formulated by analysing flexion cinematographic recordings (FCRs) and extension cinematographic recordings (ECRs) in healthy controls. Sequences in ECRs were more consistent than in FCRs and were therefore used to define "normal" motion. Five blinded spine surgeons scored randomized graphs from ECRs in 20 healthy controls and 10 pre-operative CDDD patients, using this definition, at three time points. Sensitivity, specificity, and reliability were calculated.ResultsReliability of scoring as normal or abnormal is high (Fleiss kappa of 0.80-0.84, range of 95% CI: 0.66- 0.98), sensitivity and specificity are also high, with an average sensitivity of 90% (range of 95% CI: 78.4 - 99.8%), and an average specificity of 85% (range of 95% CI: 72.9 - 96.4%).ConclusionsThis is the first described method which can reliably differentiate between normal or abnormal movement of the cervical spine in an individual subject. This enables an observer to determine if the normal sequence is restored after arthroplasty. In contrast to the given method, sROMs are not able to distinguish between healthy controls and CDDD patients.

8 keywords...

hide…